NEOGEN Dermalogy Real Cica Pad vs Anua Heartleaf 77% Clear Pad
Same shelf, different answers — here's the whole picture in one table. Click either product for full ingredient decode, skin-twin reviews and every retailer's landed cost.
| NEOGEN Dermalogy Real Cica Pad | Anua Heartleaf 77% Clear Pad | |
|---|---|---|
| Step | Toner | Toner |
| Price | $20 | $27 |
| Best landed cost | $25.99 | $27 |
| Rating | ★ 4.9 (28) | ★ 4.6 (4,700) |
| Evidence grade | B | A |
| Korea signal | — | #3 toner · Olive Young Korea (seed) |
| Hero ingredients | Centella (cica), PHA (gluconolactone) | Heartleaf, PHA (gluconolactone) |
| Best for | Sensitivity, Redness / Rosacea-prone, Texture | Redness / Rosacea-prone, Acne, Texture |
| Skin types | Sensitive, Dry, Normal, Combination | Oily, Combination, Sensitive, Normal |
| Texture | pad | pad |
| Tone note | All tones | All tones |
| Fragrance-free | ✓ | ✓ |
| Fungal-acne safe | ✗ | ✓ |
| US stock | ✓ | ✓ |
Our read: Anua Heartleaf 77% Clear Pad carries the stronger evidence grade (A); NEOGEN Dermalogy Real Cica Pad wins on landed cost. If your concerns match both, evidence is the tiebreaker we'd use.
Prices and rankings are seed data pending weekly verification. Take the 60-second quiz and both products get a personal match score on their pages.